The technical director, Mike Smith, and director of employment and skills, Andrew Eldred, of the Electrical Contractors Association, have highlighted the continued risk of fire, following the Grenfell fire, as a result of the use of what they refer to as under-qualified installers.
Their view is that electricians, plumbers, and builders who are insufficiently qualified are still being used, and that this is likely to lead to a higher risk of electrocution and fire.
They have warned both the government and industry against a “counterproductive trend towards short classroom-based courses which claim to prepare budding tradespeople for electrical and other installation work. They do not provide the technical understanding, or the extended real-life, on-the-job experience needed to ensure safe electrical work”.
They also say that in particular “it is time to say a final goodbye to the so-called “five-week wonders” – wrongly deemed by some as competent to design and install electrical work”. In addition, they state that within the electrotechnical industry many individuals are claiming to be competent electricians despite having trained, in some cases, for only a matter of weeks.
The problem with all this for a businessman or woman is that they could quite easily call in someone to repair an electrical appliance, or change the wiring on something, in the belief that the electrician that arrived is fully qualified
Pat Tester and therefore competent to carry out whatever work is required. Let’s face it, electricity can be extremely dangerous, and it is worrying that you could discover that the electrician who arrived had spent five weeks in a classroom and had precious little experience of practical work out in the real world.